The story of a plesiosaur find was reported widely in contemporary newspapers. But what was less widely reported was that when the carcass was taken to the California Academy of Sciences in San Francisco, the plesiosaur story was quickly debunked. Scientists there immediately identified it as the decomposing carcass of a Baird's Beaked Whale. The long neck was actually just a twisted strand of blubber still attached to the neck.
The real mystery was, who was this 'E.L. Wallace' who had claimed the animal was a plesiosaur? Douglas Long, a research associate at the California Academy of Sciences, recently told the story of the Moore's Beach Monster in an article posted at Deep Sea News, and he notes that E.L. Wallace was the real hoax, since no record of this man's existence can be found outside of his brief appearance on the beach at Santa Cruz. Long writes:
"Either some scientist impersonator dubbed 'E. L.
Wallace' ordained himself 'noted naturalist' in an attention-grabbing
act of grandstanding and duping local press and public alike, or the
name and association was a post-facto fabrication in later writings
intended to instill some sense of authority to the plesiosaur claim."
Back in the 1920s, the California Academy of Sciences researchers published their findings about the creature in the Journal of Mammalogy. However, it should be no surprise that their findings never received the press that the initial claim of a plesiosaur find did. [Damien's note: After all, dead whale is not an interesting story, whereas dead plesiosuar is a winner.]
And so the story of a Santa Cruz plesiosaur
lingered on in popular culture. To this day, many cryptozoology books
and sites still claim that the remains of a plesiosaur washed up on
Moore's Beach back in 1925.
Source: Museum of Hoaxes
------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment